News / Articles and opinions

Open letter to President Buzek on Art 17

Brussels 14 July 2011

Dear President Buzek,

On behalf of the European Parliament Platform for Secularism in Politics, EPPSP, I would like to thank you for your contribution to the debate on the implementation of Article 17 of the Lisbon Treaty on June 29th.

By way of this letter I would like to share a few more thoughts with you, that arose from the debate.

We very much subscribe to your remarks about the importance of legitimacy: all citizens must feel represented by the EU institutions, in particular the European Parliament. Therefore it is essential that any arrangement for the implementation of Article 17 reflects the full range of beliefs, convictions and life stances held by 500 million European citizens. However, we are concerned that the current arrangement does not meet that objective.

First of all, not all convictions and beliefs held by European citizens, are organized. Therefore, an arrangement that is based exclusively on contacts with formal associations or institutions, by its very nature excludes a large part of the European population and advantages organized religion over secular voices. We therefore suggest that more thought is given as to how the dialogue foreseen by Article 17 can be made more inclusive and representative, so as to genuinely give a voice to all citizens, not just those who have signed up to an association or community.
We suggest that modern media and communications technologies would enable many more people, in particular young people, to take part. In our view, proposals for the organization of the Dialogue should be prepared by the Presidency and put to the House for approval.

Secondly, although we appreciate the appointment of a Vice President of the Parliament responsible for contacts with religious and non-confessional organizations, we are concerned that secular voices are not sufficiently heard.
We therefore propose a second Vice President be appointed to ensure contacts with secular organizations, both religious and non religious, such as the convictions and life stances represented in the EPPSP. In this context we point out that Vice President Miguel Angel Martinez has closely followed the work of the platform for secularism in Parliament and he would be a suitable candidate.

We hope we can further shape the Dialogue together, and make it fully inclusive and representative.

With kind regards,

Sophie in ‘t Veld
Chair European Parliament Platform for Secularism in Politics

C.c.
Vice President Laszlo TÖKÉS
Guy VERHOFSTADT, President ALDE Group
Joseph DAUL, President EPP Group
Martin SCHULZ, President S&D Group
Jan ZAHRADIL, President ECR Group
Rebecca HARMS and Daniel COHN-BENDIT, Co-Presidents Greens/EFA Group
Lothar BISKY, President GUE/NGL Group
Nigel FARAGE  and Francesco SPERONI, Co-Presidents EFD Group

Tags: ,

Report on EPPSP meeting on Art 17 – 29 June 2011

On 28 June 2011 the EPPSP organized a meeting on the Implemenation of Art 17 in the European Parliament. Contributions were made by President Jerzy Buzek and Vice-President Tökès in charge of the Art 17 Dialogue.

President Buzek, who makes no secret of his strong Christian beliefs, spoke emolliently of “a community of shared values, whatever their source” and, noting the variety of arrangements in Europe for relations between church and state, said that this was a matter for member states, not for the EU authorities. He preferred to talk of the “autonomy” rather than the “separation” of church and state: religions (and non-religious philosophies) and governments should maintain a mutual respect coupled with full freedom to manage their own affairs. As to the Parliament’s implementation of the “Article 17″ dialogue mandated under the Lisbon treaty he had delegated this to his vice-president László Tokés to organise. Meantime a meeting of the three EU presidents – Parliament, Commission and Council – had been held recently with religious representatives and arrangements would be made for a similar meeting with non-religious groups later in the year.

Read more…

 

Tags: , , , ,

Questions posted to the Commission by the European Parliament

On November 11 2010, Nikolaos Chountis (GUE/NGL), Member of the European Parliament, asked the European Commisison for a written answer on a question regarding state aid and the taxation of the commercial activities of ecclesiastical legal persons.

The question reads as follows:

The Commission has launched an investigation into whether the tax status accorded the Vatican by the Italian State is consistent with Community law (IP/10/1319). The announcement states that the special tax arrangements applying to the commercial activities of non-profit-making entities will be investigated to determine to what extent they constitute State subsidy and an infringement of competition rules.

In Greece, there has been intense debate for many years over the taxation of property belonging to the Church and the Mount Athos monasteries, which is either exempt from taxation or enjoys special tax status. What tax arrangements applicable to which ecclesiastical legal persons in Italy is the Commission investigating as state aid? Does the Commission also intend to examine the tax arrangements applying to ecclesiastical entities and to the Mount Athos monasteries in Greece which pursue commercial activities as ecclesiastical legal persons, as it is doing with the tax arrangements applying in Italy?

The answer is expected in due time. Please find the original question here.

Meeting 15 September 2010: Conscientious Objection in Medicine

Sophie in ‘t Veld, Chair of the European Parliament Platform for Secularism in Politics (EPPSP), organized the Platform’s meeting on the subject of Conscientious Objection in Medicine, with speakers from Italy, U.K., Belgium and Poland. more…