News / Articles and opinions

“New EP President gives boost to secular voices in Parliament”

D66 Press Release

Brussels, March 28th 2012

 Sophie in ‘t Veld, Chair and founder of the European Parliament Platform for Secularism in Politics (EPPSP), welcomes the dedication of the new European Parliament President Schulz to start a balanced and representative implementation of Article 17 in the European Parliament, without further delay. The article refers to the obligation, introduced by the Lisbon Treaty, for the EU to maintain an open, transparent and regular dialogue with churches and philosophical and non-confessional organisations.

MEP In ‘t Veld will draft a letter to the Presidency of the European Parliament with proposals on how to ensure a representative, inclusive and transparent dialogue, doing justice to the diversity in religion, belief and life stance in Europe. She comments: “The implementation of Article 17 should be a general dialogue on European values and ethics. The organization of the dialogue must reflect Europe’s diversity: are the principles enshrined in the EU Treaties just words on paper or do we actually live up to them? Secularism allows everybody to live together equally instead of granting preferred treatments to specific groups of people. That’s why the EU’s institutions should be secular, representing all of the 500 million citizens.”

Tuesday EP President Schulz, upon invitation of the EPPSP, participated in an exchange of views on Article 17. He commented: “There is no single European society. The many different views within Europe should be respected and reflected in the dialogue. Non-believers have to respect the right to religion. But their non-belief should never be used against them. The dialogue between religious and non-religious organizations becomes more and more important as the secular approach faces increasing problems.”

In ‘t Veld agrees: “The implementation of Article 17 has so far been very one-sidedly focussing on relations with churches, increasingly deaf to secularist voices, whether atheist, agnostic, humanist, (liberal) religious or other life stance. It means conservative religious groups and religious groups that have a well organised lobby, like the Vatican, are disproportionately influencing European policies, whereas hundreds of millions of Europeans are not heard. The EU institutions have a duty to ensure that all 500 million citizens are equally heard, regardless of their religion or belief, regardless of whether they have chosen to join a community or association of like minded people.”

In ‘t Veld was pleased with Tuesday’s debate and is looking forward to a fruitful cooperation with President Schulz. “The European Parliament Platform for Secularism in Politics strongly supports the statements made by President Schulz when he spoke from the chair during the debate with Hungarian Prime Minister Orbán, stressing that “Europe will be pluralist, or it will fail”. We fully share his view of the European Parliament as a “multi-religious, multi-ethnic, multi-national assembly. Based upon his statements made on Tuesday, we feel confident that real change is under way. “

EPPSP has been campaigning for many years to promote knowledge, understanding and acceptance of freedom of religion and non-religion, and the impartiality of the EU regarding organizations of faith and conviction. President Schulz’ predecessor, Jerzy Buzek, left  unanswered the question on how the European Parliament would ensure an inclusive, representative and transparent dialogue with religions and secular life stances.

 

The Venice commission criticizes religious freedom in Hungary

The Venice Commission, the Council of Europe’s advisory body on constitutional law responded to a request from the government of Hungary for an advisory opinion, by issuing a report on Hungary’s 2011 Act ‘On the Right to Freedom of Conscience and Religion and the Legal Status of Churches, Denominations and Religious Communities. The new Act on Churches, that was adopted on 14 July 2011, was widely criticized in Hungary and abroad because it grants formal recognition to only 14 out of 352 religious organizations in Hungary.

The main conclusions of the report are:

105. Freedom of thought, conscience and religion is one of the foundations of a democratic society. In this respect, it may only be restricted by strict criteria set out in international instruments.

106. States benefit from a large margin of appreciation with regard to the relationship between the church and the state and with regard to the choice of their policies and regulation in this field. The Venice Commission recognises that there is legitimate concern in Hungary to eliminate the abuse of religious organisations, which have operated for illicit and harmful purposes or for personal gain. One of the main justifications for this new Act is the need to prevent some religious organizations from abusing the possibility of receiving public funding. Although various types of solutions have been found throughout Europe, the European guarantees must not be undermined.

107. As a whole, the Act constitutes a liberal and generous framework for the freedom of
religion. However, although few in number, some important issues remain problematic and fall short of international standards.

108. The Act sets a range of requirements that are excessive and based on arbitrary criteria with regard to the recognition of a church. In particular, the requirement related to the national and international duration of a religious community and the recognition procedure, based on a political decision, should be reviewed. This recognition confers a number of privileges to churches concerned.

109. The Act has led to a deregistration process of hundreds of previously lawfully recognised churches, that can hardly be considered in line with international standards.

110. Finally, the Act induces, to some extent, an unequal and even discriminatory treatment of religious beliefs and communities, depending on whether they are recognised or not.

111. The Venice Commission was informed that – as a reaction to the draft opinion – the
Government intends to introduce amendments, which is welcome. The Commission had no possibility to examine these proposals but it remains at the disposal of the Hungarian
authorities for any further assistance.

 

Tags: ,

Ugandan LGBT Activists file case against Evangelical

Ugandan LGBT Activists filed a case against a US Evangelical for inciting the persecution of gay men and lesbians in Uganda. The evangelical ‘conspired with religious and political leaders in Uganda to whip up anti-gay hysteria with warnings that gay people would sodomize African children and corrupt their culture’.

Find here newscoverage about the lawsuit

 

Answer from President Schulz on the portfolio of Vice President Surján

European Parliament President Schulz accepted the invitation from the European Parliament Platform for Secularism in Politics to unfold his viewpoints on the implementation of Article 17 TFEU on the 27th of March.

Furthermore, President Schulz has indicated to propose to the Bureau a changing of the wording of Vice President Surján’s portfolio, to a more neutral “Implementation of Article 17 TFEU”.

The Platform would like to thank Mr Schulz for accepting the invitation to address the meeting on the 27th of March and to express its satisfaction with the willingness of the President to respond positively to our recommendation.

Letter President Schulz Art 17 – 7 March 2012

 

Tags:

Answer from Vice-President Surján on invitation for EPPSP meeting on 27 March

Regrettably, EP Vice-President Mr Surján has turned down the invitation to address the Platform on the 27th of March. He is of the opinion that this meeting is organized in preparation of a futureexchange of views of the implementation of article 17. Currently he is familiarizing himself with the actors that are actors in this dialogue.

In his letter he indirectly gives an answer to some of our questions posed in the letter to the Bureau we sent on the 29th of February 2012.

The letter of Mr. Surján can be found here: