Tag Archives: Art 17

Answer from President Schulz on the portfolio of Vice President Surján

European Parliament President Schulz accepted the invitation from the European Parliament Platform for Secularism in Politics to unfold his viewpoints on the implementation of Article 17 TFEU on the 27th of March.

Furthermore, President Schulz has indicated to propose to the Bureau a changing of the wording of Vice President Surján’s portfolio, to a more neutral “Implementation of Article 17 TFEU”.

The Platform would like to thank Mr Schulz for accepting the invitation to address the meeting on the 27th of March and to express its satisfaction with the willingness of the President to respond positively to our recommendation.

Letter President Schulz Art 17 – 7 March 2012

 

Tags:

Answer from President Schulz regarding implementation of Article 17 of the Lisbon Treaty

Today we received an answer from the President of the European Parliament, Mr Schulz, to the open letter to the Members of the Bureau of the European Parliament on the implementation of Article 17 of the Lisbon Treaty which was sent on the 6th of January by the European Parliament Platform for Secularism in Politics.

Read here the answer of the President.

Read here the open letter of the EPPSP.

 

Tags: , ,

Open letter to the Members of the Bureau of the European Parliament on the implementation of Article 17 of the Lisbon Treaty

Sophie in ’t Veld, chair of the European Parliament Platform for Secularism in Politics, has sent a letter to the Members of the Bureau of the European Parliament. This letter concerns the poor implementation of Article 17 of the Lisbon Treaty. The Bureau consists out of fourteen Members of the European Parliament, who decides on the organisation of the Parliament and its rules. It is therefore the organ within the European Parliament that reviews the dialogue between the European Parliament and (non-) confessional organisations, as laid down in Article 17 of the Lisbon Treaty. You can find the letter here.

Tags: ,

EHF complains to EU Ombudsman about treatment by EU Commission

On 19 October 2011 the European Humanist Federation sent a complaint to the European Ombudsman about the refusal of the EU Commission to meet them in a “dialogue seminar” as part of the “open, transparent and regular dialogue” with churches, religious associations or communities, philosophical and non-confessional organisations which is mandated by Article 17:3 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (as amended by the Lisbon Treaty). The Commission regularly holds such dialogue seminars with the churches.

The press release is also available in DutchFrench, German and Italian.  For coverage in the Belgian newspaper Le Soir, see here (page 1) and here (page 8 ).

Read here The EHF’s complaint to the Ombudsman

In the meantime the EU Ombudsman answered in a letter to the EHF dated 15 November, where he tells of the questions he has put to the Commission. The EU Ombudsman is taking seriously the EHF’s complaint about the EU Commission’s approach to the Aritcle 17 dialogue with EHF and in particular its treatment of their request for a dialogue seminar.
See here for an EHF press release, dated 23 November

Tags: ,

EU should include secular voices in dialogue with citizens

Sophie in ‘t Veld, Chair and founder of the European Parliament Platform for Secularism in Politics, today spoke (on a conference) on the theme of  Article 17 of the Treaty of Lisbon. The article states that the EU should consult regularly, through a formal dialogue, with both religious and non-confessional organizations, such as Humanists.

Yet, according to In ‘t Veld, secularist voices are not being heard. “All citizens must feel represented by the EU institutions, in particular the European Parliament. Therefore it is essential that any arrangement for the implementation of Article 17 reflects the full range of beliefs, convictions and life stances held by 500 million European citizens.
However, the current organization of dialogue under Article 17 entails the risk that religious voices in the EU are becoming many times stronger than the secular ones. Not all convictions and beliefs held by European citizens are organized. Therefore, an arrangement that is based exclusively on contacts with formal associations or institutions, by its very nature excludes a large part of the European population and advantages organized religion over secular voices.
Religious groups are simply better organized and therefore more strongly represented in formal dialogues like this”, said In ‘t Veld.

During the meeting, In ‘t Veld again expressed her concerns about the lopsided balance between religious and secular sounds in the current dialogue with the European institutions. “The EU began as a secular project. The EU institutions are not a representation of individual groups or religions, but of all 500 million European citizens together.”

In June 2011, during a meeting organized by the European Parliament Platform for Secularism in Politics, President Buzek promised to organize an equal platform for secular voices. This will be the first dialogue between the EU and non-confessional groups, taking place this fall.

Tags: , , ,