Tag Archives: crucifix

EPPSP meeting with Judge Tosti

On the 15th of June, the European Parliament Platform for Secularism in Politics heard the case of the Italian Judge Luigi Tosti.

Mr Tosti refused to work in an Italian courtroom where a crucifix was hanging. After several lawsuits, Mr Tosti was removed from the judiciary by the state’s Supreme Court in March 2011.

Mr Tosti is preparing to lodge an appeal under Article 34 of the European Convention on Human Rights, on the basis of violation of his right of religious freedom (both negative and positive) and the violation of the right of equality and non-discrimination on the basis of religion.

During the Brussels meeting, Judge Tosti stated that freedom of religion is a fundamental right. Everyone is free to adhere to any religion, and free not to choose a religion. A state based on the rule of law needs to have an unbiased judiciary, therefore any biased appearance (such as a crucifix being a religious symbol) needs to be avoided.

As is laid down in Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, every member state has the duty to be neutral and impartial. The compulsory presence of a crucifix in every Italian courtroom is obviously in conflict with this fundamental requirement. Mr Tosti proposed the Italian Minister of Justice to allow him to place other religious and non-religious symbols alongside the crucifix, in order to restore neutrality. This however was not allowed by the Italian state. Hereafter, Mr Tosti refused to do sittings and was eventually removed from the Italian Magistracy in March 2011.

During the meeting, it was pointed out by Mr Tosti and his lawyer that within the European Union, there is increasing cooperation on police and legal matters. This increasing mutual confidence in each other’s legal systems implies an important mainstreaming of certain standards, particularly with regards to neutrality.

A national legal system needs to be neutral and not dominated by one specific religion.

The European Parliament Platform for Secularism in Politics will follow Mr Tosti’s lawsuit at the European Court of Human Rights closely and will give him all the support he needs.

Press: RNW (in English / in Spanish)

Read also (in French): “Le « décrocheur de crucifix » retrouve un poste dans l’école publique : Le libre-penseur Valentin Abgottspon, licencié en raison de son combat pour la laïcité, a été engagé dans une école publique. » more

Tags: , , , ,

Statement of the European Network Church on the Move

Statement of the European Network Church on the Move

6 April, 2011

The European Court of Human Rights under Christian Europe’s pressure

The European Parliament Platform for Secularism in Politics states that the Grand Chamber’s ruling is a heavy blow to the separation of church and state, while the Vatican hails the historic decision, thus contributing to polarisation.

The European Network Church on the Move is disappointed that the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights utterly reversed the 2009 unanimous judgment condemning the compulsory presence of crucifixes in state schools classrooms. 

This is the result of continuous joint religious and political pressures from many countries and widespread fears of a public opinion on the possible reduction of their traditional identity. But we must point out that many Christians  and of course non-religious believers throughout Europe have a different opinion on religious symbols and secularism .

Through acknowledging the crucifix as a religious symbol, the Grand Chamber explicitly favours one -dominant- particular religion, thus infringing the secular nature of EU institutions and specially the principles of democratic equality and non-discrimination laid down in the Treaty on the Union. The judges cannot fail to be aware that the freedom of religion is jeopardised if the state favours a particular religion .  

As Christians we have the duty to ask the Churches and all our Christian sisters and brothers to respect the crucifix, a religious symbol, keeping it present in our consciences and refusing it be used as a cultural and identity-linked symbol.

Déclaration du Réseau européen Eglises et Libertés 

6 avril 2011

La Cour européenne des droits de l’Homme sous la pression de l’Europe  Chrétienne

La Plateforme du Parlement européen pour la laïcité en politique déclare que la décision de la Grande Chambre est un coup sérieux porté  à la  séparation de l’Eglise et de l’Etat, tandis que le Vatican salue la décision historique, contribuant ainsi à la  polarisation.

Le Réseau européen Eglises et Libertés  est désappointé de ce que la Grande Chambre de la Cour européenne des droits de l’Homme a totalement inversé le jugement rendu à l’unanimité en 2009 condamnant la présence obligatoire du crucifix dans les salles de classe des écoles de l’Etat .

Ceci est le résultat de pressions religieuses et politiques continues et conjointes exercées par de nombreux pays et de craintes largement répandues dans l’opinion publique d’atteinte possible à leur identité  traditionnelle. Mais nous devons souligner que beaucoup de chrétiens et bien sûr les croyants non-religieux dans toute l’Europe ont une opinion différente sur les symboles  religieux et sur la sécularisation.

En reconnaissant le crucifix comme un symbole religieux symbol,  la Grande Chambre favorise explicitement une religion -dominante- particulière, portant ainsi atteinte à la nature laïque des institutions de l’UE et aux principes de l’égalité démocratique et de la non-discrimination inscrits dans le Traité sur l’Union. Les  juges ne peuvent pas ne pas être conscients que la liberté religieuse est menacée si l’Etat favorise une religion particulière.  

En tant que chrétiens, nous avons le devoir de demander aux Eglises et à nos soeurs et frères chrétiens de respecter le crucifix, symbole religieux, en le gardant présent dans nos consciences et en refusant qu’il soit utilisé comme un symbole culturel et identitaire.

Tags: , ,