Tag Archives: EPPSP meeting

EU should include secular voices in dialogue with citizens

Sophie in ‘t Veld, Chair and founder of the European Parliament Platform for Secularism in Politics, today spoke (on a conference) on the theme of  Article 17 of the Treaty of Lisbon. The article states that the EU should consult regularly, through a formal dialogue, with both religious and non-confessional organizations, such as Humanists.

Yet, according to In ‘t Veld, secularist voices are not being heard. “All citizens must feel represented by the EU institutions, in particular the European Parliament. Therefore it is essential that any arrangement for the implementation of Article 17 reflects the full range of beliefs, convictions and life stances held by 500 million European citizens.
However, the current organization of dialogue under Article 17 entails the risk that religious voices in the EU are becoming many times stronger than the secular ones. Not all convictions and beliefs held by European citizens are organized. Therefore, an arrangement that is based exclusively on contacts with formal associations or institutions, by its very nature excludes a large part of the European population and advantages organized religion over secular voices.
Religious groups are simply better organized and therefore more strongly represented in formal dialogues like this”, said In ‘t Veld.

During the meeting, In ‘t Veld again expressed her concerns about the lopsided balance between religious and secular sounds in the current dialogue with the European institutions. “The EU began as a secular project. The EU institutions are not a representation of individual groups or religions, but of all 500 million European citizens together.”

In June 2011, during a meeting organized by the European Parliament Platform for Secularism in Politics, President Buzek promised to organize an equal platform for secular voices. This will be the first dialogue between the EU and non-confessional groups, taking place this fall.

Tags: , , ,

Report on EPPSP meeting on Art 17 – 29 June 2011

On 28 June 2011 the EPPSP organized a meeting on the Implemenation of Art 17 in the European Parliament. Contributions were made by President Jerzy Buzek and Vice-President Tökès in charge of the Art 17 Dialogue.

President Buzek, who makes no secret of his strong Christian beliefs, spoke emolliently of “a community of shared values, whatever their source” and, noting the variety of arrangements in Europe for relations between church and state, said that this was a matter for member states, not for the EU authorities. He preferred to talk of the “autonomy” rather than the “separation” of church and state: religions (and non-religious philosophies) and governments should maintain a mutual respect coupled with full freedom to manage their own affairs. As to the Parliament’s implementation of the “Article 17″ dialogue mandated under the Lisbon treaty he had delegated this to his vice-president László Tokés to organise. Meantime a meeting of the three EU presidents – Parliament, Commission and Council – had been held recently with religious representatives and arrangements would be made for a similar meeting with non-religious groups later in the year.

Read more…

 

Tags: , , , ,

EPPSP meeting with Judge Tosti

On the 15th of June, the European Parliament Platform for Secularism in Politics heard the case of the Italian Judge Luigi Tosti.

Mr Tosti refused to work in an Italian courtroom where a crucifix was hanging. After several lawsuits, Mr Tosti was removed from the judiciary by the state’s Supreme Court in March 2011.

Mr Tosti is preparing to lodge an appeal under Article 34 of the European Convention on Human Rights, on the basis of violation of his right of religious freedom (both negative and positive) and the violation of the right of equality and non-discrimination on the basis of religion.

During the Brussels meeting, Judge Tosti stated that freedom of religion is a fundamental right. Everyone is free to adhere to any religion, and free not to choose a religion. A state based on the rule of law needs to have an unbiased judiciary, therefore any biased appearance (such as a crucifix being a religious symbol) needs to be avoided.

As is laid down in Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, every member state has the duty to be neutral and impartial. The compulsory presence of a crucifix in every Italian courtroom is obviously in conflict with this fundamental requirement. Mr Tosti proposed the Italian Minister of Justice to allow him to place other religious and non-religious symbols alongside the crucifix, in order to restore neutrality. This however was not allowed by the Italian state. Hereafter, Mr Tosti refused to do sittings and was eventually removed from the Italian Magistracy in March 2011.

During the meeting, it was pointed out by Mr Tosti and his lawyer that within the European Union, there is increasing cooperation on police and legal matters. This increasing mutual confidence in each other’s legal systems implies an important mainstreaming of certain standards, particularly with regards to neutrality.

A national legal system needs to be neutral and not dominated by one specific religion.

The European Parliament Platform for Secularism in Politics will follow Mr Tosti’s lawsuit at the European Court of Human Rights closely and will give him all the support he needs.

Press: RNW (in English / in Spanish)

Read also (in French): “Le « décrocheur de crucifix » retrouve un poste dans l’école publique : Le libre-penseur Valentin Abgottspon, licencié en raison de son combat pour la laïcité, a été engagé dans une école publique. » more

Tags: , , , ,